Abstract:

This paper presents an integrated approach combining in-person teaching with digital assessments in a mechanical engineering course, leveraging a blended learning environment to enhance both physical and remote instructions. The primary focus is on addressing challenges associated with digital exams, such as hardware and software limitations, connectivity issues, and the risk of cheating. To mitigate these barriers for digital exams, the paper proposes creating unique exam tasks based on student IDs and employing semi-automatic grading of computer drawings using Python scripts, which streamline the assessment process while ensuring accuracy and fairness.

Traditional assessment methods typically involve written exams, computer-based tests, practical labs, oral exams, and project-based assessments. These methods require students to attend exams in person, with activities strictly monitored to prevent cheating. However, this approach highlights the need to transition from traditional methods to digital assessments, focusing on knowledge application rather than simply recalling the information. In order to show the possibility of such a transition, a Computer-Aided Design (CAD) course is employed as a case study, where theoretical knowledge is assessed through digital quizzes and practical skills via design challenges and final exams. By creating unique tasks based on student IDs, the course ensures exam integrity and fairness and still allows students to work on the assigned problem on their own computer device and on their own time schedule. Additionally, a semi-automatic system compares the volumetric properties of student-generated 3D models with reference solutions using Python scripts. This approach significantly reduces manual grading workload while maintaining high assessment standards.

The course structure aligns learning activities with desired outcomes through the Constructive Alignment of Biggs et. al. Weekly quizzes handled via Moodle automatically grade the theoretical knowledge of the students, while biweekly tutorials and practical sessions support the transition from theory to practical application. Design challenges, graded and contributing to the final exam score, motivate students and provide continuous feedback and assessment. This dynamic learning environment not only engages students but also enhances the retention of theoretical knowledge and its practical application through digital tools.

In conclusion, this paper showcases the successful integration of digital assessment methodologies in mechanical engineering education. By addressing and overcoming challenges early, and aligning learning activities with outcomes, the blended learning approach enhances the educational experience. The strategic use of unique exam tasks and semi-automatic grading systems not only ensures fair and accurate assessments but also prepares students for the demands of the digital age in their professional careers.

Keywords:

Mechanical engineering, blended learning, design challenges, semi-automatic grading.