Abstract:

Even before the enactment of the new university regulatory framework defined by the “Bologna process”, the University of Cadiz carried out pilot experiences to develop some final reports of various university degrees or/and masters. One of the first conclusions to be drawn from these first written reports was the significant arbitrariness and the disparities that defined the contents and methodology of the new courses called End of Degree or/and Master Project (DMFP) included in the modules of the same names. In order to implement these experiences, it was necessary to design a catalogue of training and tutoring activities, to be used as a basis to assess the DMFP´s contents. Once the catalogue was designed, one subject was selected for its implementation. Finally, a rubric document was also applied to analyze the reliability of the evaluation and selection criteria, which was based on aspects such as the public presentation of works or performing technical research

Keywords:

rubric documents, Field visits as a training resource, cooperative learning, multilevel evaluation, Reliability analysis.