DIGITAL LIBRARY
CHANGING SPACES: ACADEMIC STAFF’S PERCEPTIONS OF CONVENTIONAL AND IMAGINED LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS
1 University of Wolverhampton (UNITED KINGDOM)
2 Coventry University (UNITED KINGDOM)
About this paper:
Appears in: EDULEARN19 Proceedings
Publication year: 2019
Page: 3293 (abstract only)
ISBN: 978-84-09-12031-4
ISSN: 2340-1117
doi: 10.21125/edulearn.2019.0887
Conference name: 11th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies
Dates: 1-3 July, 2019
Location: Palma, Spain
Abstract:
The poster reports on the final phase of a mixed methods study exploring the perceptions of formal and informal learning spaces at a UK university. A growing body of literature has highlighted a relationship between a physical learning environment and student outcomes in higher education (Adams Becker et al., 2018; Cleveland & Fisher, 2014; Yang et al., 2013). Yet, it remains a challenge to determine precisely what makes a ‘good’ learning space (Jessop et al., 2012; Park & Chloi, 2014; Sawers et al., 2016). Since our previous findings suggested a disconnect between student appreciation of a learning environment and actual learning experience, the current study focuses on academic staff’s perceptions of how educational facilities can be utilised to enhance learning and teaching. To elicit faculty members’ perspectives on desirable classroom characteristics, focus group discussions were conducted. A purposeful sampling strategy was used to recruit eight lecturers across four faculties within the case study institution. The focus group participants were shown photos of existing as well as aspirational learning spaces and asked to consider what features would facilitate or inhibit their teaching approaches. The initial findings offer insight into academic staff’s classroom experience and provide recommendations for designing future higher education learning spaces as sites of active learning.

References:

[1] Adams Becker, S., Brown, M., Dahlstrom, E., Davis, A., DePaul, K., Diaz, V. & Pomerantz, J. (2018). NMC Horizon Report: 2018 Higher Education Edition. Louisville: EDUCAUSE.
[2] Cleveland, B. & Fisher, K. (2014). The evaluation of physical learning environments: A critical review of the literature. Learning Environments Research, 17 (1): 1-28.
[3] Jessop, T., Gubby, L. & Smith, A. (2012). Space frontiers for new pedagogies: a tale of constraints and possibilities. Studies in Higher Education, 37 (2): 189-202
[4] Park, E. L. & Choi, B. K., (2014). Transformation of classroom spaces: Traditional versus active learning classroom in colleges. Higher Education, 68 (5): 749-771.
[5] Sawers, K. M., Wicks, D., Mvududu, N., Seeley, L. & Copeland, R. (2016). What Drives Student Engagement: Is it Learning Space, Instructor Behavior or Teaching Philosophy? Journal of Learning Spaces, 5 (2): 26-38.
[6] Yang, Z., Becerik-Gerber, B. & Mino, L., (2013). A study on student perceptions of higher education classrooms: Impact of classroom attributes on student satisfaction and performance. Building and Environment, 70: 171-188.
Keywords:
Learning spaces, higher education, student experience, active learning classroom.