DIGITAL LIBRARY
DOES STUDENT TEAM LEADERSHIP MAKE A DIFFERENCE TO SOCIAL LOAFING BEHAVIOUR IN UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT TEAMS?
University of Cape Town (SOUTH AFRICA)
About this paper:
Appears in: INTED2020 Proceedings
Publication year: 2020
Pages: 8513-8518
ISBN: 978-84-09-17939-8
ISSN: 2340-1079
doi: 10.21125/inted.2020.2315
Conference name: 14th International Technology, Education and Development Conference
Dates: 2-4 March, 2020
Location: Valencia, Spain
Abstract:
Undergraduate students’ perceptions of social loafing behaviour were investigated within a South African university teamwork context (N = 229). Four components of perceived social loafing behaviour were investigated: unavailability (of the loafer), poor work quality, discussion non-contribution and technology loafing. Loafer apathy (a general lack of care or interest) predicted significant variance in each of the four loafing behaviours. Students compensated (a social compensation effect) for a social loafer’s poor work quality, rather than reducing their inputs (the sucker effect). Moderation analysis using PROCESS indicated that having an effective student team leaders increases a team’s ability to compensate for a member with perceived loafer apathy. Interestingly, apathetic loafers in teams with effective leaders tend to engage in more technology loafing. Results of this preliminary study point to the importance of further research on student team leadership to determine its influence on loafing behaviour and the subsequent team compensatory effect.
Keywords:
Social loafing, leadership, undergraduate teams.