DIGITAL LIBRARY
MEDIA CHANGE AND MEDIA LITERACY – ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF MEDIA EDUCATION IN THE TIME OF MEDIATIZATION
University of Education Ludwigsburg (GERMANY)
About this paper:
Appears in: ICERI2017 Proceedings
Publication year: 2017
Pages: 8565-8571
ISBN: 978-84-697-6957-7
ISSN: 2340-1095
doi: 10.21125/iceri.2017.2329
Conference name: 10th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation
Dates: 16-18 November, 2017
Location: Seville, Spain
Abstract:
Mediatization Theory is one of the most discussed concepts in media sciences today (cf. Hjavard 2013; Ampuja/Koivisto/Väliverronen 2014). Krotz (2001; 2007) could show, that media change depends not only on technical development as medium theory said (cf. McLuhan 1964; Meyrowitz 1985), but firstly media change depends on the media praxis of media users. Media become media when and in the way they were used as media (cf. Hepp/Krotz 2014; Hepp 2013). But the most interesting aspect of mediatization theory is that with this developing and changing media use the way of human communication is changing too - necessarily and not just today but since beginning of human media use in prehistorical time (cf. Krotz 2009). This has effects on today's human self-understanding in an Hegelian sense and education in general. This paper deals with the philosophical-ethical implications of mediatization for a pedagogical concept of media competence and media literacy. It argues that mediatization can be seen as the epochal awareness (cf. Rath 2014) and the medial practices of today (cf. Hartmann/Hepp 2010) and media literacy as the fundamental normative aim of education in general (cf. Rath 2013). Today's educational concepts have to deal with media literacy (cf. Livingstone 2009) or they will not be relevant for actual education at all.

References:
[1] Ampuja, M/Koivisto, J/Väliverronen, E (2014) Strong and Weak Forms of Mediatization Theory. A Critical Review. In: Nordicom Review 35, Special Issue, pp. 111-123.
[2] Hartmann M/Hepp A (Eds.) (2010) Die Mediatisierung der Alltagswelt. Springer/VS, Wiesbaden
[3] Hepp A (2013) The communicative figurations of mediatized worlds: Mediatization research in times of the ‘mediation of everything’. In: European Journal of Communication 28(6), pp. 615-629. doi:10.1177/0267323113501148
[4] Hepp A, Krotz F (Eds.) (2014) Mediatized worlds: Culture and society in a media age. Palgrave Macmillan, London
[5] Hjavard S (2013) The mediatization of culture and society. Routledge, London
[6] Krotz F (2001) Die Mediatisierung kommunikativen Handelns. Der Wandel von Alltag und sozialen Beziehungen, Kultur und Gesellschaft durch die Medien. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen
[7] Krotz F (2007) Mediatisierung. Fallstudien zum Wandel von Kommunikation. Springer/VS, Wiesbaden
[8] Krotz F (2009) Mediatization: A concept with which to grasp media and societal change. In: Lundby K (Ed.) Mediatization: Concept, changes, consequences. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main/New York, pp. 21-40
[9] Livingstone S (2009) On the mediatization of everything. Journal of Communication 59, pp. 1-18
[10] McLuhan M (1964) Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill, New York
[11] Meyrowitz J (1985) No sense of place. The impact of the electronic media on social behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford
[12] Rath M (2013) Normativ-ethische Begründungsleistungen für die Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft – Beispiel „Medienkompetenz“. In: Karmasin, M/Rath, M/Thomaß, B (Eds.): Die Normativität in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Springer/VS, Wiesbaden, pp. 443-466
[13] Rath, M (2014) Ethik der mediatisierten Welt. Springer/VS, Wiesbaden
Keywords:
Mediatization theory, media education, media literacy, media competence, ethics of education, media ethics.