Abstract:

From the very first years of University, architects focus on design, while engineers concentrate on efficiency. The teaching and learning approaches for each discipline are quite different. However, the ultimate goal of both careers is the same: to design and build useful, stable, sustainable, and beautiful buildings and infrastructure. Therefore, it is worth considering the incorporation of collaborative practices at the university level. In doing so, architects would learn to consider efficiency, and engineers would learn to appreciate design.

On the other hand, it is demonstrated that before rehabilitating, reusing, transforming, or replacing an existing structure, a thorough analysis is essential. This analysis should encompass not only the current structural conditions and the budget but also consider the environmental impact, the historical and cultural significance, the future use, and adherence to current regulations. These parameters are influenced by the specific context in which the structure exists. It is crucial for students in Architecture and Engineering to begin addressing this complexity during their time at university. A focused, structured, high-impact activity would help students understand and engage with these challenges.

Architecture students from San Pablo CEU Universisty (Madrid, Spain) and Civil Engineering students from the University of PUCE (Santo Domingo, Ecuador) collaborated in teams to analyze five different footbridges in both cities. Their analysis examined various factors, including the load-bearing systems according to local regulations, the historical context, environmental integration and the future needs of the surrounding areas.

Organizing this activity posed challenges. Each team member had to understand their specific role and the purpose of their contribution. Teams needed clear guidelines on what to submit, what to share during the final presentation, and how their work would be assessed. Choosing the right footbridge examples was a lengthy process involving careful discussion among lecturers.

While such activities may be perceived as time-consuming, they proved invaluable when well-planned. Through this collaborative exercise, students gained a holistic understanding of how to assess structures, blending technical knowledge with cultural and environmental considerations. They developed essential problem-solving skills and appreciated the unique challenges of each site, preparing them for future professional practice. This experience emphasized the importance of teamwork and cultural exchange in addressing global infrastructure challenges.

Keywords:

Architecture-Engineering Collaboration, footbridges, cultural exchange, structural analysis, structural assessment.