THE EFFECT OF SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION IN DENTAL SCHOOL. STUDENTS ASSESS THIS TEACHING MODALITY FROM BOTH PERSPECTIVES IN DETERMINING THE ADAPTIVE STRATEGIES THIS PROGRAM ENHANCES
Stony Brook Dental School (UNITED STATES)
About this paper:
Appears in:
INTED2013 Proceedings
Publication year: 2013
Pages: 4018-4020
ISBN: 978-84-616-2661-8
ISSN: 2340-1079
Conference name: 7th International Technology, Education and Development Conference
Dates: 4-5 March, 2013
Location: Valencia, Spain
Abstract:
Dental students must manage multiple sources of stress especially during their formative clinical years in dental school. Simultaneously, as part of being a professional, these same students have an inherent responsibility to serve in a leadership role while in dental school. It is recognized that the development of coping mechanisms to diminish the damaging effects of the constant and increasing intensity of stress is important for every level of dental student. This study evaluated a peer mentoring program at Stony Brook Dental School(Supplemental Instruction or SI) to determine student perceptions of its benefits and to identify areas for improvement. Data were collected through a monthly survey sent out to all Year 2 and Year 3 dental students. The twenty item survey was based on anonymous student responses prior to the posting of grades to elicit student assessment of the peer mentoring program, from both a mentor and mentee perspective. Ninety percent of the student body participated with representation from our D-2 and D-3 student body population. The second year students were the recipients or mentees of the mentoring and the third year students were carefully calibrated to enable them to be the leaders or mentors of this program. Year 2 students found this peer mentoring program an effective tool in the development of the critical thinking skills deemed necessary by the third year students who had successfully completed the clinical course a few months prior. The instruction and training provided during these sessions was not tutoring – a reiteration of the material presented in class – but rather additional content that would expand the students’ knowledge base and facilitate the student’s success in the course. Various strategies, that may otherwise be obvious to someone who had gone through the course, were given to the D-2 students as an aid to their mastery of the material and techniques. Year 3 students found this peer mentoring program an effective tool in the development of their leadership skills and further mastery of and exposure to the foundation knowledge they had already learned. This study suggests that supplemental instruction is an important part of the overall learning process in a dental school program.