DIGITAL LIBRARY
WRITING ACROSS CONTENT AREAS IN DUTCH AND FLEMISH SECONDARY EDUCATION
1 Ghent University (BELGIUM)
2 Radboud University (NETHERLANDS)
About this paper:
Appears in: EDULEARN18 Proceedings
Publication year: 2018
Pages: 3487-3494
ISBN: 978-84-09-02709-5
ISSN: 2340-1117
doi: 10.21125/edulearn.2018.0903
Conference name: 10th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies
Dates: 2-4 July, 2018
Location: Palma, Spain
Abstract:
This paper presents an exploratory study analysing writing pedagogies, both explicitly and implicitly, across content areas in Dutch and Flemish secondary schools (Flanders is the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium). Semi-structured interviews were held with teachers (N=112) and writing instructions (N=45) were collected. The resulting data was analysed using a number of theoretical concepts, concerning beliefs about writing pedagogies, functions of writing and perspectives on language teaching and learning. The results indicated that many teachers are not process-oriented, but teach writing in a product-oriented way. Learning through writing is barely present in their teaching. Although teachers from other subjects certainly pay attention to language and writing, their practice lacks pedagogic insight on writing.

References:
[1] Bazerman, C. 2011. The disciplined interdisciplinarity of writing studies. Research in the Teaching of English 46, no. 1: 8-21.
[2] Bonset, H. and M. Braaksma. 2008. Het schoolvak Nederlands opnieuw onderzocht. Een inventarisatie van onderzoek van 1997 tot en met 2007.[The school subject Dutch scrutinized again. An inventory of research from 1997-2007]. Enschede: SLO.
[3] Fulwiler, T. 1984. How well does writing across the curriculum work? College English 46, no. 2: 113-125.
Guba, E. and Y.S. Lincoln. 1994. Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, ed. N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, 105-117. Thou¬sand Oaks, London & New Delhi: Sage Publications.
[4] Kieft, M., G. Rijlaarsdam and H. van den Bergh. 2008. An aptitude-treatment approach to writing-to-learn. Learning and instruction no. 18: 379-390.
[5] Mottart, A., P. Vanbrabant, P-H. van de Ven. 2010. Schrijven bij diverse schoolvakken – voorbeelden, analyses en aanbevelingen. Levende Talen Tijdschrift, no. 11-2: 22-29. [Writing for various school subjects - examples, analyses and recommendations.]
[6] Russell, D. R. 1992. American origins of the writing-across-the-curriculum movement. In Writing, teaching, and learning in the disciplines, ed. A. Herrington and C. Moran, 22-42. New York, NY: Modern Language Association of America.
[7] van de Ven, P.H. 2003. ‘O jee’ – zes leerlingen vwo over schrijven.[ ‘Oh no’. Six secondary students about writing]. Moer no. 1: 12-19.
[8] van der Leeuw, B. 2006. Schrijftaken in de lerarenopleiding. Een etnografie van onderwijsvernieuwing. [ Writing tasks in teacher education. An ethnography of educational innovation]. Heeswijk-Dinther: Esstede.
Keywords:
Grammar education, attainment targets, secondary education, curriculum design.