DIGITAL LIBRARY
BRIDGING THE GAPS BETWEEN LEARNING AND TEACHING THROUGH RECOGNITION OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING APPROACHES
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia (MALAYSIA)
About this paper:
Appears in: ICERI2009 Proceedings
Publication year: 2009
Pages: 681-692
ISBN: 978-84-613-2953-3
ISSN: 2340-1095
Conference name: 2nd International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation
Dates: 16-18 November, 2009
Location: Madrid, Spain
Abstract:
Learning approaches, learning methods and learning environments are believed to have mitigation effects on students’ academic performance (example, Fuller, 1999; Biggs, Kember and Leung, 2001). Studies have also revealed that students use different learning approaches and strategies and these in turn influence their academic achievement. However, students’ learning approaches and strategies are not the sole factors that impact their academic achievement but other determinants such as learning methods and learning environments may also surface (Jarvis and Woodrow, 2001). This research investigates the relationship among these variables and the students’ academic performance. The research analyzes Biggs, (2001) 20-item Revised-Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) to measure students’ learning approaches and strategies and adapted Jarvis and Woodrow (2001) six constructs to measure students’ learning method and five on learning environment. The research was conducted on 213 social science degree students consisted of four different programs. Self-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data. The finding reveals that students who adopted deep learning approach perform better in academic performance in comparison to those who use surface learning approach. The study also indicates that lecture (mean 2.60) is the learning environment most preferred and ranked highly by students, followed by seminar discussions (mean 2.91). The other learning environments such as small group task (mean 3.05), practical workshop (mean 3.18) and individual research (mean 3.27) are less favored by the students. In addition, in terms of learning methods, the majority of the students preferred hearing and explanation (mean 2.43) followed by talking and discussing (mean 2.80). The other learning methods are less preferred by students – reading books (mean 3.63), reading journals (mean 3.88), reading online (mean 4.16), and solving problems (4.09). The findings of this research also seem to reveal that students are dependent on lecturers to help them to understand content knowledge on subjects taught. Essentially, this research provides invaluable information to program management and academicians to tailor their teaching with students’ specific needs. Further more, it also provides an insight to aid management decision-making to plan intervention programs to encourage students to be more self-dependent and learn in groups and be more resource investigators.


Keywords:
learning approach, learning method, learning environment, deep.