DIGITAL LIBRARY
DOES COMPUTER USE MAKE THE DIFFERENCE? SOME RESULTS FROM PISA 2006
European Commission – Joint Research Centre (EC - JRC) (ITALY)
About this paper:
Appears in: EDULEARN10 Proceedings
Publication year: 2010
Pages: 679-688
ISBN: 978-84-613-9386-2
ISSN: 2340-1117
Conference name: 2nd International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies
Dates: 5-7 July, 2010
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Abstract:
Changing needs of economic and social development have been urging governments to emphasise the contribution of education to a wide range of newly required skills and competencies. “21st Century skills” are considered to be key enablers of responsible citizenship in a knowledge-based economy. It is, therefore, relevant to assess and compare how education systems are dealing with technology integration in education, particularly in terms of securing and improving access, enhancing a wide range of educational and managerial uses, and monitoring the effects and impacts on the development of critical technology-related skills and competencies.
Based on these considerations, the current study focuses on the impact of students’ computer use on their achievement in science controlling for students and school characteristics. Competencies in using new technologies differ across population clusters, e.g. gender (Mediappro, 2005) or SES (Pedrò, 2009). Computer use is introduced into the analysis considering three dimensions: the frequency of use, the experience in using this device as well as the place where the computer is used (at home, at school or both). In addition, following Witter and Senkbeil (2008), the paper aims at understanding whether the different ways students use a computer have different effects on their performance in science. The following questions will be addressed:
1. Has the use of a computer a statistically significant effect on students’ performance in science?
2. Does the way in which students use a computer affect their achievement in science?
The research questions are addressed using a hierarchical linear modeling approach to compare the variance within and between schools and countries.
The primary source of data for our analysis is the PISA 2006 survey. Policy implications will be addressed.

References
Brown, G. (2007). International surveys of educational achievement: how robust are the findings? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 170(3): 623-646
Fuchs, T., Wöβmann, L. (2007). What accounts for international differences in student performance? A re-examination using PISA data. Empirical Economics, 32: 433-464
Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: the PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1): 23-37
Hofman, W.H., Hofman, R.H., Gray, J.M., (2010). Institutional Context and International Performances in Schooling: comparing pattern and trends over time in international surveys. European Journal of Education, 45(1): 154-172
Marks, G.N. (2008). Are father’s or Mother’s Socioeconomic Characteristics More Important Influences on Student Performance? Recent International Evidence. Social indicator research, 85: 293-309
Mediappro, (2005). The appropriation of new media by youth. http://www.mediappro.org/publications/finalreport.pdf
Nævdal, F. (2007). Home-PC usage and achievement in English. Computers & Education, 49: 1112-1121
OECD (2010). Are New Millennium Learners Making the Grade? Technology Use and Educational Performance in PISA. www.sourceoecd.org/education/9789264017733
Pedrò, F. (2009). New millennium learners in higher education: evidence and policy implications. NML Conference. Brussels, September 21st 2009. http://www.nml-conference.be/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/NML-in-Higher-Education.pdf
Wittwer, J., Senkbeil, M. (2008). Is students’ computer use at home related to their mathematical performance at school? Computers & Education, 20: 1558-1571
Keywords:
computer usage, school, achievement PISA.