DIGITAL LIBRARY
LIFELONG LEARNING IN DEGREE APPRENTICESHIPS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF DRIVERS AND BARRIERS
1 Manchester Metropolitan University (UNITED KINGDOM)
2 Private consultant (UNITED KINGDOM)
3 Cardiff Metropolitan University (UNITED KINGDOM)
About this paper:
Appears in: EDULEARN26 Proceedings
Publication year: 2026
Article: 1605
ISBN: 978-84-09-88444-5
ISSN: 2340-1117
doi: 10.21125/edulearn.2026.1605
Conference name: 18th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies
Dates: 29 June-1 July, 2026
Location: Palma, Spain
Abstract:
Lifelong learning (LLL) has become a defining feature of contemporary higher education and workforce development, particularly within degree apprenticeships, which aim to integrate academic study with professional practice. This study analyses the drivers and barriers that underpin lifelong learning within degree apprenticeship ecosystems and examines their influence on the tripartite relationships between learners, employers, and educators.

The review draws on research evidence, policy reports, and theoretical perspectives to identify key factors that encourage lifelong learning. These include work-based and work-integrated learning pedagogies, strong employer engagement, supportive policy structures, flexible learning structures, and expansive workplace environments that encourage identity development, reflection, and adaptability. Collectively, these drivers position degree apprenticeships as powerful mechanisms for cultivating metacognitive skills, career resilience, and continuous professional development.

However, the literature also highlights a series of systemic barriers that inhibit the developmental potential of apprenticeships. Studies consistently highlight workload intensification, limited entitlement to protected study time, and variability in managerial support as key constraints that shape learners’ capacity to engage meaningfully with programme requirements. Research on vocational and professional learning also draws attention to bureaucratic and assessment misalignments, which fragment the learning experience and disrupt the coherence of theory–practice integration. Furthermore, administrative burdens borne by both learners and educators combine with persistent inequities in access, progression, and support to reproduce patterns of structural disadvantage. Taken together, these constraints generate learning environments that sharply constrain learner agency, significantly reduce opportunities for reflective practice, and ultimately undermine the core developmental ambitions of degree‑level apprenticeships.

This paper links these drivers and barriers to established theoretical frameworks and illustrates how systemic conditions influence learning processes, professional identity development, and opportunities for participation.

The study concludes that degree apprenticeships hold significant potential for embedding lifelong learning across educational and workplace settings, but this potential is contingent on coherent policy design, inclusive practices, strengthened employer partnerships, and streamlined governance. In response to these findings, the study highlights several evidence-informed recommendations. These include enhancing reflective opportunities, improving employer engagement, embedding inclusive learning environments, and ensuring better alignment between academic and workplace expectations.

Through its integrative and theory-informed analysis, this study advances the wider field of work-integrated learning by offering a holistic synthesis of the drivers and constraints shaping lifelong learning within degree apprenticeship ecosystems. It also provides stakeholders, including policymakers, employers, and higher education institutions, with actionable insights for enhancing the effectiveness, equity, and long‑term sustainability of lifelong learning within degree apprenticeship programmes.
Keywords:
Lifelong Learning, Degree apprenticeships, Tripartite, Apprenticeships drivers, Apprenticeship barriers.