About this paper

Appears in:
Page: 4853 (abstract only)
Publication year: 2017
ISBN: 978-84-617-8491-2
ISSN: 2340-1079
doi: 10.21125/inted.2017.1133

Conference name: 11th International Technology, Education and Development Conference
Dates: 6-8 March, 2017
Location: Valencia, Spain

USING A LEADERSHIP AND LEARNING MATRIX FOR ALIGNING COURSE OUTCOMES, MEETING STATE PROGRAM APPROVAL, AND REGIONAL AND NATIONAL ACCREDITATION IN A UNIVERSITY EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM

G. Koonce

Regent University (UNITED STATES)
A historic shift is happening in the field of educational leadership due to policy changes in long standing standards for school leaders as well as accreditation standards for preparing these school leaders. The political and policy landscape for these changes is being driven by two organizations. The National Policy Board for Educational Administration (NCPEA) revised the Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standards in December of 2015 and renamed them the Professional Standards for Educational Leaders (PSEL). The Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) published the new CAEP Standards for Advanced Programs in August 2016. These changes involve substantial implications for educational leadership programs in Virginia and across the nation. The purpose of this study will be to explore the newly approved CAEP and PSEL standards to restructure learning outcomes, Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) competencies for Administration & Supervision endorsement, Southern Association of Colleges & Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC) standards, and national accreditation pathway through CAEP for the Educational Leadership Programs in the School of Education at Regent University. Through the design of a school leadership and learning matrix (L&L Matrix), each of the four components (PSEL, VDOE, SACS, & CAEP) will be aligned and cross-referenced with each course in the Educational Leadership Masters, Specialist, and Doctoral programs in one continuously flowing “charted” document. The matrix as well as the process in designing the matrix will be the outcome as a model curriculum guide for the educational leadership preparation field.
@InProceedings{KOONCE2017USI,
author = {Koonce, G.},
title = {USING A LEADERSHIP AND LEARNING MATRIX FOR ALIGNING COURSE OUTCOMES, MEETING STATE PROGRAM APPROVAL, AND REGIONAL AND NATIONAL ACCREDITATION IN A UNIVERSITY EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM},
series = {11th International Technology, Education and Development Conference},
booktitle = {INTED2017 Proceedings},
isbn = {978-84-617-8491-2},
issn = {2340-1079},
doi = {10.21125/inted.2017.1133},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/inted.2017.1133},
publisher = {IATED},
location = {Valencia, Spain},
month = {6-8 March, 2017},
year = {2017},
pages = {4853}}
TY - CONF
AU - G. Koonce
TI - USING A LEADERSHIP AND LEARNING MATRIX FOR ALIGNING COURSE OUTCOMES, MEETING STATE PROGRAM APPROVAL, AND REGIONAL AND NATIONAL ACCREDITATION IN A UNIVERSITY EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM
SN - 978-84-617-8491-2/2340-1079
DO - 10.21125/inted.2017.1133
PY - 2017
Y1 - 6-8 March, 2017
CI - Valencia, Spain
JO - 11th International Technology, Education and Development Conference
JA - INTED2017 Proceedings
SP - 4853
EP - 4853
ER -
G. Koonce (2017) USING A LEADERSHIP AND LEARNING MATRIX FOR ALIGNING COURSE OUTCOMES, MEETING STATE PROGRAM APPROVAL, AND REGIONAL AND NATIONAL ACCREDITATION IN A UNIVERSITY EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM, INTED2017 Proceedings, p. 4853.
User:
Pass: