DIGITAL LIBRARY
EXAMINING CHATGPT: HOW GOOD IS CHATGPT AT WRITING ENGINEERING COURSEWORK AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON ACADEMIC INTEGRITY MISCONDUCT
1 University of Bristol (UNITED KINGDOM)
2 University of Dundee (UNITED KINGDOM)
About this paper:
Appears in: EDULEARN23 Proceedings
Publication year: 2023
Page: 3598 (abstract only)
ISBN: 978-84-09-52151-7
ISSN: 2340-1117
doi: 10.21125/edulearn.2023.0976
Conference name: 15th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies
Dates: 3-5 July, 2023
Location: Palma, Spain
Abstract:
ChatGPT, an artificially intelligent (AI) chatbot has received a lot of attention recently due to the powerful capabilities it presents to “follow an instruction in a prompt and provide a detailed response”, according to open-AI. Based on large language models’ tools, ChatGPT can interact in a conversational way, and these models are here to stay. Many organisations are and bringing to production similar language models trained or very large corpora of publicly available datasets. This provide us with the capacity to generate realistic text which in many cases is indistinguishable from human generated text. Along with these advancements there are associated challenges, one of which will be explored in this paper. Can text generated by ChatGPT, given questions from an engineering coursework, achieve passing grades? The use of which by students could potentially leads to academic integrity misconduct in higher education. This has been done by taking a coursework on a unit in the engineering department at a University in Scotland and passing those questions as prompts to ChatGPT. The answers generated are marked by human accessors on criteria such as clarity, depth, accuracy, and relevance. For the answers generated by ChatGPT the results are expected to highlight the performance on our selected criteria, and their implications in coursework design. The research paper would be concluded with some reflection on the idea of ‘embracing’ ChatGPT and designing coursework or online exams based on the Bloom’s taxonomy.
Keywords:
ChatGPT, academic integrity misconduct, large language models, online assessments.