Abstract:

Assessment is a fundamental part of a student's learning process, which is why in researchers have developed MOOCs assessment to preform different strategies for the evaluation. It is hard to give the qualification because of the large quantity of students and small numbe of teachers. This is why the assesment in MOOCs is usually done in an automated way or through peer evaluation using rubrics so that the work done objective. In this paper we present a proposal for the development of works and evaluation through user stories that are used in agile methodologies, through which the results are shown. With this, the students must develop projects by stages (sprints) that are described by user stories with their respective acceptance criteria. Subsequently, in the peer evaluation the agile moment called 'sprint review' is made, understanding the sprint as the time lapse in which the student delivers the project. This review consists of analyzing each of the user stories that should be developed and verified with the acceptance criteria (conditions that a product must satisfy to be accepted by the client or in this case the evaluator) that must be fulfilled in their entirety so that a story can be considered as completed. n this way each student had to review three projects based on the same user stories and verify their compliance, indicating a value according to the number of criteria completed in addition to providing feedback for each story to the colleagues who delivered the project. The results obtained were very satisfactory because they allowed compliance to apply agile methodologies to the projects, the students carried out high quality projects following the user stories, but obtaining differentiated products. The peer evaluation had a high percentage of compliance, were objective and with similar valuations among the peers and the feedbacks generated were propositive and supportive to improve the works.

Keywords:

User Stories, Peer Review, Mooc.