DIGITAL LIBRARY
PRAGMATIC COMPETENCE IN EFL: AN ANALYSIS OF LEARNERS’ WRITINGS WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FOREIGN LANGUAGE CLASSROOM
University of Valencia, School of Education (SPAIN)
About this paper:
Appears in: ICERI2009 Proceedings
Publication year: 2009
Page: 3746
ISBN: 978-84-613-2953-3
ISSN: 2340-1095
Conference name: 2nd International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation
Dates: 16-18 November, 2009
Location: Madrid, Spain
Abstract:
The present paper reports the findings of a study on EFL students’ written productions, with a focus on the use of discourse markers in these texts. This study is part of a larger project on the teaching and learning of writing at different educational levels, more specifically, primary, secondary and college education, and in different languages, i.e., Spanish, Catalan and English. Discourse markers constitute a window to look at a communicator’s ideas and their organization in a text (cf. Halliday & Hasan, 1989; Schiffrin, 1987; etc.), so that one can get to discourse content in conjunction with the author’s style of reasoning (Campbell, 1992), i.e., the logical process a speaker/writer follows to link his or her intent to argue in the different propositions building his/her argument with his/her claim. In the case of EFL writers, discourse markers can thus provide information on the learners’ pragmatic competence in the target language, as regards writing and the rhetorical conventions underlying the production of specific genres (cf. Leki, 1992). In this paper, pragmatic competence refers in general to conscious knowledge of distinct linguistic, relational and socio-cultural assumptions operating across contexts and informing determinate linguistic choices in a given language. With the aim of accounting for the pragmatic competence of EFL learners by exploring their use of discourse markers at different stages in their educational process, written productions of EFL primary, secondary and college students were collected for this study. Discourse analysis with the aid of specialised software for qualitative research (cf. Johnston, 2006) was followed as the method of data analysis (cf. Brown and Yule, 1983; Schiffrin et al., 2003; etc). In general, the results of this research reveal differences in the use of certain discourse markers that point to specific features characterising the pragmatic competence of the students participating in this study in different stages of their learning process. On the other hand, similarities in the use of these linguistic elements were also found across educational stages, which indicate commonalities in learners’ writing competence in EFL overall. All in all, the findings of this study may modestly contribute to raise teachers’ awareness of their students’ needs in written communication in the target language.