DIGITAL LIBRARY
PROMOTION OF TALENT: WHAT HAS LITERATURE SAID IN THE LAST DECADE?
1 Universidade Federal do Paraná e Cátedra de Juventude, Educação e Sociedade da UNESCO (BRAZIL)
2 Universidade Portucalense Infante D Henrique (PORTUGAL)
3 Universidade Federal do Paraná (BRAZIL)
4 Universidade Portucalense. IJP-Portucalense Institute For Legal Research (PORTUGAL)
About this paper:
Appears in: ICERI2018 Proceedings
Publication year: 2018
Pages: 4457-4464
ISBN: 978-84-09-05948-5
ISSN: 2340-1095
doi: 10.21125/iceri.2018.2004
Conference name: 11th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation
Dates: 12-14 November, 2018
Location: Seville, Spain
Abstract:
The talented individuals are able to perform activities superior to what was expected to their age, with development being carried out through three factors that could accelerate and / or hinder the process: intrapersonal, environmental and luck or opportunity factors. The diversity of individual characteristics within the academic context drives the organization of a system of program planning and support to respond to the needs, in particular of the talented students.

There is a concrete need to systematize the contributions of psychology and education sciences to the study of talent, reflecting critically on emerging perspectives and future directions in the study and promotion of talent. It was felt, upstream of this study, the need to deepen the indicators that allow the clarification of the talent construct, through a critical and psychoeducational vision for intervention in this field. This study deepens discussions that have already been built in the last decade, with the aim of systematizing the contributions of psychology to the promotion of talent, reflecting critically on emerging perspectives and future directions in psychologicaland educational intervention in the promotion of talent. Is reveal, in detail, the process implemented. The systematic review of the literature served to broaden the interpretative possibilities of the results, reconstructing readings from a decade of literature, and ensuring descriptive validity, interpretive validity, validity theoretical and pragmatic validity. The products of this systematic review are discussed and discussed.
Keywords:
Talent, systematic review of the literature.