About this paper

Appears in:
Pages: 5552-5559
Publication year: 2013
ISBN: 978-84-616-3847-5
ISSN: 2340-1095

Conference name: 6th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation
Dates: 18-20 November, 2013
Location: Seville, Spain

EVALUATING A HUMAN-USER GAMING INTERFACE THAT EMPLOYS INTERACTIVITY TO ASSESS VISUALIZATION AS COMPARED TO MORE CONVENTIONAL FORMS OF VISUALIZATION ASSESSMENT

C. Blue

University of Southern Maine (UNITED STATES)
This research is an experimental investigation evaluating a human-user gaming interface assessment tool that employs interactivity to assess visualization as compared to more conventional forms of visualization assessment. This research considered the relationship between a sample’s discernible spatial ability skills by comparing static visualization test of rotations results with those of an interactive game that was designed with identical static image rotations. This study utilized a convenient sample enrolled in an exploratory technical visualization course that provided a diversity of lectures and hands-on practicum that included identifying and creating technical sketching and renderings of multi-view drawings and axonometric projections of simple objects. This course also provided an introduction to computer vector graphics creation software for two-dimensional and three-dimensional representational modelling. The goal of the course was to introduce, expand, and explore participants’ ability to identify, and challenge their ability to create and better comprehend technical visualization artifacts.
For the purposes of this research, a mature and widely used visualization-testing instrument was selected to compare with one designed with interactivity and gaming features. A conventional form of the Purdue Spatial Visualization of Test of rotations (PSVT) was compared to an Interactive Spatial Visualization Gaming Instrument (SVGI). It was theorized that conventional forms of assessment influenced test retention and fatigue, whereas interactivity as it is related to cognitive ergonomics of interface and the human users would enhance assessment performance. The results of these findings could demonstrate that participants’ analytical processing capabilities are connected to an influence of interactivity.
@InProceedings{BLUE2013EVA,
author = {Blue, C.},
title = {EVALUATING A HUMAN-USER GAMING INTERFACE THAT EMPLOYS INTERACTIVITY TO ASSESS VISUALIZATION AS COMPARED TO MORE CONVENTIONAL FORMS OF VISUALIZATION ASSESSMENT},
series = {6th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation},
booktitle = {ICERI2013 Proceedings},
isbn = {978-84-616-3847-5},
issn = {2340-1095},
publisher = {IATED},
location = {Seville, Spain},
month = {18-20 November, 2013},
year = {2013},
pages = {5552-5559}}
TY - CONF
AU - C. Blue
TI - EVALUATING A HUMAN-USER GAMING INTERFACE THAT EMPLOYS INTERACTIVITY TO ASSESS VISUALIZATION AS COMPARED TO MORE CONVENTIONAL FORMS OF VISUALIZATION ASSESSMENT
SN - 978-84-616-3847-5/2340-1095
PY - 2013
Y1 - 18-20 November, 2013
CI - Seville, Spain
JO - 6th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation
JA - ICERI2013 Proceedings
SP - 5552
EP - 5559
ER -
C. Blue (2013) EVALUATING A HUMAN-USER GAMING INTERFACE THAT EMPLOYS INTERACTIVITY TO ASSESS VISUALIZATION AS COMPARED TO MORE CONVENTIONAL FORMS OF VISUALIZATION ASSESSMENT, ICERI2013 Proceedings, pp. 5552-5559.
User:
Pass: